Home > Gadgets & Toys > Say Hello to Zune Surface

Say Hello to Zune Surface

December 1st, 2012
Pricing for the Surface with Windows 8 just came out: $999 for the 128 GB version, but you have to add $120 or $130 for a keyboard. That comes out to $20 or $30 more than a Macbook Air. That is not a good price point to compete with the iPad. That price is for a gadget that essentially is a Macbook Air with a detachable keyboard and a higher-resolution touchscreen—or, in less charitable terms, it's a device that can't figure out if it's a laptop or a tablet, and does poorly at both. As a laptop, it is less elegant / more clunky than the Air, though it has virtually identical specs save for the slightly smaller touchscreen with a higher resolution. Oh, and half the battery life. SurfpadairThey make a big deal about the thickness being 14mm, which is thinner than the Air at its thickest (the Air ranges from 3mm to 17 mm)—but what they fail to mention is that with the keyboard, it's thicker. The “Touch cover” (a keyboard with little tactile response) is 3 mm, putting the fully-outfitted Surface at 17 mm, or exactly as thick as the thickest part of the Macbook Air—but the Surface is the same thickness all over, making it bulkier the air. Choose the 6mm “Type Cover” for Surface (which most people will prefer), and it becomes much thicker and bulkier than the Air. The weight is “under two pounds,” but again, with the keyboard, that will inflate, probably making it about the same weight as the Macbook Air. Which means that it'll be like a blocky, inelegant Ultrabook, but probably too thick to qualify for that slim status. As a tablet, it's going to feel worse than an iPad—a lot bigger, heavier, and clunkier. It's got about 5% more surface area than an iPad (it has a wider aspect ratio), and even without the keyboard is about 50% thicker. However, the real problem here is that Microsoft is trying to create a new category of device without defining it. The Surface is not a tablet, nor is it a laptop or an “Ultrabook” (Macbook Air imitation). It's a hybrid. It's not trying to be anything new, it's trying to be two older things at once. And that's not a good idea, because it compares unfavorably to both things it's trying to outclass in the contexts they both inhabit. Microsoft is trying to make people think that you get the best of both worlds. The problem is, they're trying to mash together a car and a bicycle and they're not getting a motorcycle. They're getting something more like a small car with bicycle wheels and pedals. When people get a laptop, they expect the best power, comfort, and convenience with the lowest price tag. The Surface has power, but comfort? With the larger, blockier design? You can't use the keyboard when you want to use it as a laptop. That sucks. There's a kickstand, but that works only when you use it on a table, so it's not really a laptop, but a portable desktop. The keyboard detaches, but is that really convenient? To have to carry that around as well, sticking it on and off? I got Apple's iPad cover, but rarely use it because it comes off all the time in my bag. When people get a tablet, they expect something light, thin, and fun to hold. The Surface is not that. It's too big, too heavy, too blocky. They expect to consume, so all the apps designed for authoring really are not an advantage. Seen as a tablet, with what tablets are used for in mind, the Surface is not a very good one. When Apple made the iPad, they didn't think like focus-group- and spec-oriented salespeople giving uninspired orders to engineers. They didn't just take a whole bunch of features and try to cram them into a case. Apple worked organically. They looked at the concept of a tablet, and carefully considered: how will people use this? How will it be held? If I had this device in my hands, what would be my natural inclination in terms of what I do with it? Apple concluded that, with a hand-held tablet, people would consume but not author so much. So they steered design and implementation towards that idea. As a result, Apple succeeded brilliantly with the iPad where Microsoft had failed for a decade. It was the same with the Macbook Air; they didn't just jump on the netbook bandwagon when it rolled around. They didn't just make a clunky, $300 piece of crap. They waited until they got it just right—and now, the market in netbooks has transformed into the market of Macbook Air wannabes, or Ultrabooks. The Surface ignores all of this. Microsoft didn't think organically, they just crammed a whole bunch of stuff into a shell and tried to make it work as well as they could. What you have is a machine with nice specs, but is not designed for anything specific. It works poorly as a small laptop, and not so great as a tablet either. It does not have a niche, except for tech fanboys and people who jump at new devices. In short, it's classic Microsoft. Because Microsoft has a huge publicity engine and can lean on the sales side, they will sell a decent number. But it will not be a threat to the iPad, nor to the Macbook Air. I may be proven wrong in a few years, but I do not think so; I think the iPad and the Air will continue to dominate, and the Surface will just be a second-rate device that most people have heard about but don't see very often. If the device does not become a hit in 3-4 years, Microsoft will quietly put it to sleep. In short: it's a Zune. Six years ago, I actually overestimated the Zune, figuring that, despite its crappiness, Microsoft would continue to improve and improve it. Well, they did, for at least a generation or two. But a few months after the Zune came out, the iPhone came out. I pronounced the Zune dead, and was right. Even Microsoft's persistence and machinery could not save that bad idea from the new interface Apple had created. I believe it won't even take a new idea from Apple to kill the Surface; I think the Surface concept is fatally flawed from the start.

Categories: Gadgets & Toys Tags: by
  1. Tim Kane
    December 1st, 2012 at 01:54 | #1

    I hear from inside sources that some time after the first of the year, Intel is rolling out new CPUs. These will allow PC manufacturers to produce laptops that are very thin, even by ultrabook standards, that are also convertable.

    That means if you are running Windows 8, you flip the screen then collapse it upon the keyboard and it becomes a touch screen tablet like device. It might be sans apps, but it will function as a large tablet. It would seem that if people can own PCs that can easily convert and function like a tablet, then that would have to take away some of the demand for tablet computers.

    In my own case, I like the idea of owning one of these, and owning a Samsung Note II, and hopefully for-going the buying of a tablet device altogether, but if I did it would probably be of the Ipad-mini size and variety.

    I would hope that Apple sees this coming and is working on convertable laptops of their own – because if they can and do, their ap base would still provide them with consistent demand and higher market share.

    While I mainly agree with you on all the points you make, my main point would be that all of this stuff is fluid and could change. Microsoft had no problems putting out the original windows software as junk in order to hold down the franchise and market share circa 1989 until they came up with something a little better. It wasn’t until 1998 that they XP finally did that. So they are willing to float a bunch of cruddy devices into the market to keep the franchise alive until a better future arrives, and I think that this time next year, they’ll will probably already be in that better future.

  2. Troy
    December 1st, 2012 at 14:35 | #2

    mash together a car and a bicycle and they’re not getting a motorcycle

    congrats, you’re the first on the internet to make that allusion! (and it’s great!)

    or, “wise man say man who try to sit on two stools end up on floor”

    as for Luis’ expectations, there’s:

    “Upstream supply chain sees Surface RT orders cut by half”

    http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20121128PD215.html

    that’s the ARM version, but it looks like the magic magnesium or whatever they’re using for the ubercool housing isn’t working. . .

    I’m kinda poking around the market now but my OG 2010 iPad is still working fine for me, even if Apple in its infinite wisdom left me at iOS 5.

    I’ll get the iPad Mini when it goes retina.

    My 2008 MBP is still doing OK but maybe it’s time to go retina here, too. Next year’s Haswell look to have pretty good embedded GPUs at least, so maybe I’ll pull the trigger on an Air.

    Having an Air and a fullsize tablet is retarded, but an Air and a 7″ tablet seems pretty cool. Maybe I’ll complete the set with my first iPhone, LOL.

  3. Troy
    December 1st, 2012 at 14:45 | #3

    That means if you are running Windows 8, you flip the screen then collapse it upon the keyboard and it becomes a touch screen tablet like device.

    all that mechanical jazz comes at a cost (not just in price, but reliability, weight, and size)

    An iPad Mini is $330, the 11″ MBA is $1100. The utility of a Mini and MBA is pretty good.

    Apple’s trackpad makes their laptops pretty easy to use IMO.

  4. Fred Martin
    December 3rd, 2012 at 12:40 | #4

    It is weird that Microsoft doesn’t really have a viable price point in any of the normal categories with the Surface.

    Too expensive for the low-end, Chromebooks and smaller Android tablets hold that.

    Too expensive for mid-range, iPads, better Android tablets, and regular HP and Dell laptops own that, although less people are buying those laptops.

    Too underpowered for the high-end and Apple dominates that… let’s not kid ourselves with the whole “Ultrabook” thing, nobody has those.

    It almost seems like in a few years, nobody will want these cheesy Microsoft computers of any kind. The real battle appears to be Google OSes and Apple OSes with Apple pushing down from the high-end pricing (iPad mini) and Google pushing up from the low end with better tablet software.

    Same with phones which should be blatantly obvious with Windows phone holding less than 5% of the market. Pundits keep saying Windows phone success is just about to happen as soon as people realize what they are. I think people do realize what they are: the things not in their pocket.

Comments are closed.