Archive

Archive for the ‘Tokyo Caucus’ Category

Caucus Photos

February 10th, 2004 Comments off

The photo gallery for the Democrats Abroad Japan Caucus is up and ready for view. If you would like copies of any photos at larger resolutions and/or higher image quality, leave a comment to let me know. Enjoy!

Categories: Tokyo Caucus Tags:

Caucus #6: And You Can See It on TV Read It in the NYT

February 9th, 2004 1 comment

I asked the film crew that was at the caucus, and they said that what they taped would be on a show on Channel 4 (Tokyo) aired from 5 pm to 7 pm on Tuesday, which presumably would be tomorrow… this being Monday, just by thirty minutes.

Will give more info when I get it.

UPDATE:Well, for some reason they didn’t have use on TV. They did 15 minutes on a soccer player, 20 minutes on a transgender performer in Roppongi and even more time on a dry cleaning service, but we didn’t make the cut–very disappointing. There was a fire in Akihabara that kind of ran through the newscast, so possibly we got bumped for that.

However, the New York Times did see fit to writing an article about us!

Categories: Tokyo Caucus Tags:

Caucus #5: And the Wrap-Up

February 8th, 2004 Comments off

Well, the caucus has been over for a while now–I stopped over at Akiyoshi for dinner after having had no breakfast or lunch, then came straight home and rested for a while.

The caucus went a little long, until a bit past 6:30, until the Foreign Correspondents People chased us out. After we finished the delegate assignments and the votes for who would go to Scotland for the main caucus, everyone settled down again to hear out the resolutions.

First came a resolution for Environmental Justice, represented in a 3-page missive stating the necessity of environmental protection that has been so savagely attacked by the Bush administration. Rejoining the Kyoto accord, tax incentives for renewable resources, and other important environmental policies were espoused, to be voted for positively by the remaining caucus members (by this time we had lost about a third of the attendees). After that, two resolutions, affirming gay rights and staking a position against any constitutional amendment outlawing gay marriage were adopted with similar speed and acceptance.

Other resolutions, most drafted on the spot, were met with more questions and quite a few revisions. One forwarded by someone obviously a bit puzzled and overwhelmed by the confusion involved in the caucus process was to suggest the process be changed to a primary. Apparently it would have to be done so for all Democrats Abroad chapters (more than 30 now), but there were many people who agreed. Still, the the idea had not been well thought out, and there were many questions about how it would be decided and by whom. Eventually, the matter was withdrawn, though the idea will be discussed by the DA and perhaps decided later in a different forum.

Next came a proposal for “Sound Science,” which met with a great deal of questioning, but was nevertheless a very popular issue. It stemmed from the practice of Bush and conservatives in relegating scientific study to the realm of religion and politics, with only studies that supported the political desires of the administration, or agreeing with fundamentalist doctrines, allowed to be heard at the highest levels. The presenter who felt strongly enough to stand up and take on the questions stated that “the past four years have been really depressing for those who believe in things like, you know, facts… reason… research.” Discussion then began over what exactly “sound science” referred to, whether it was supposed to be a partisan or exclusionary term–which is was not, as the proponent pointed out. Eventually, the idea of defining “sound science” as repeatable results, independent verification and peer review was whittled down to “independent peer review,” allowing for uncertainty and difference of opinions resulting from differing interpretations of data. But the heart remained, that being to stop religion or political forces from censoring or steering scientific data and discussion. The proposal passed resoundingly, as did most that passed.

Then there was the suggestion forwarded by Terri MacMillan, who runs the DAJ web site and blog, to explore the possibility of forming a committee to advance outreach programs to minorities and poor communities, particularly via broadband Internet, so that they may become more a part of the political process, more connected to choices and rights available to them, and end a virtual disenfranchisement that many people today suffer from. Again, there were questions and suggestions for revisions, but when the powerful “Yea” vote came through, Terri was delighted, letting out a joyous “Oh, Wow!”

Then came a final proposed resolution, one which was met well in spirit if not well in specific form, that being to increase combat pay for those in Iraq and anyplace else where they face danger by the amount of $500 per month. This was debated on various grounds, such as how it would be paid for and exactly what the details were. Eventually, the suggestion came from Ruth McCreery that we bring back a kind of new version of the G.I. bill, guaranteeing a tuition-free education for every veteran; later, it was pointed out that the main spirit of the bill was to mend the multiple and various acts of violence done to veteran’s benefits by the Bush administration, so a repair of those wrongs was added, all on top of the $500/mo. “hazardous duty kicker” as defined by someone close to military culture. The resolution was passed.

All of these resolutions will eventually be taken to Scotland and proposed there, presumably to be worked into similar proposals and then voted on so they can be brought in to Boston for the convention.

Altogether, a productive meeting and four (really five) hours well-spent. I was very happy to find the live WiFi connection allowing me to post live from the meeting hall, and took quite a few photos, many coming soon, that helped document the activities. When more information–such as the official minutes–become available, I will post on them. Coming next: the photo gallery.

Categories: Tokyo Caucus Tags:

Caucus #4: And the Votes Are In

February 8th, 2004 Comments off

Well, it has been quite a caucus so far. We are now getting ready for the resolutions, after having taken the votes for the groups.

At the first count, it was Dean, Kerry, Kucinich, Edwards, Uncommitted, and Clark–so the Uncommitted, Clark, Edwards and Kucinich people, with the least votes, had to vote elsewhere or combine to make a larger group. This is where the “horse trading” started. A lot of the smaller-group people joined the uncommitteds, making them a viable group. The Dean group, from some reports (nothing official), had made a deal with the Kucinich people, to give them enough people to make the count in exchange for Kucinich people coming to Dean if Kucinich lost out–and that is what happened. After we lost a few people to time, the final count was: Dean 69, Kerry 51, and the Uncommitted group with 29. That’s the three delegates right there, the people going to Scotland.

Barbara, very committed to this cause and excited to be involved, volunteered to be an alternate delegate. The Kerry group, which I am in, elected a main delegate and three alternates (one of which is moving to North England in three weeks anyway). So now everything is getting dealt with so we can vote with our blue cards for the resolutions. More on that as it goes. A long process, and almost over, but it has been a real experience.

Categories: Tokyo Caucus Tags:

Caucus #3: The Democratic Process

February 8th, 2004 2 comments

Okay, here is some live (and therefore sloppy) reporting on what is happening.

Mr. Skip Orr speaks for John Kerry; a lifelong Democrat, he nonetheless served in the Reagan administration, and tells that the Bush administration, particularly what he calls the “Bush cabal” are strong neo-conservatives, way farther right than Reagan and his people ever were. He spoke of a nightmare–January 2005 and Bush is at the Rotunda, with his trademark smirk, taking the oath. Unfortunately, probably because he was trying to save time, he didn’t say too much, didn’t speak too long.

The rep for Wesley Clark, Sven Serrano, has stepped up and presented three quick video commercials, and made a very good presentation. As might be expected, everyone is wowed by Clark’s credentials. But with his low numbers in recent primaries and caucuses, there are probably a lot of people who would like to cote for him but won’t. (He later got 11 of the 140 votes cast.)

Bob Scheele came to represent John Edwards. He gave a pretty straightforward campaign stump speech, fairly much in line with the basic Democratic party lines, as with everyone else. But like Clark, behind Kerry in the voting so far, probably a lot of people are wishing he weren’t quite so vocal against taking a vice-presidential spot should he eventually drop out.

The Dean people are a very strong presence here. Lauren Shannon (of Fujimama’s) gave the presentation, with a nice TV spot and a good letter from Dean. She spoke about the Dean people from Japan and all over who came to Iowa to help with the Dean campaign. And of course, there was the inevitable mention of Dean as the outsider, and particularly as the one who protested and stood up against Bush first, and got this whole ball of wax rolling as it has. The Dean people are indeed committed, a lot of fire in their bellies, but the Dean campaign is lagging after not having won a single state yet, and with Dean so far behind in Wisconsin, which he has pretty much tagged now as a do-or-die state. But this is really a Dean stronghold here, and a lot of votes are going to Dean. (Dean later got the most votes, though because this is a caucus, he got one of three delegates.)

Wayne Parton speaks for Dennis Kucinich, although he was not the official representative–so he read from a script. Told the story of Kucinich, which was impressive enough. Youngest mayor of Cleveland, college instructor, and Congressman from Ohio, replacing the Republican incumbent. Also fought against the “Enron-like” takeover of Cleveland’s power system. He also spoke well on how Kucinich voted against the Patriot Act, against the war in Iraq–and spoke honestly about his chances, but pointed out rightly that Clinton was way down in January, and that getting to the convention and contributing to the party plank is important. This “unofficial” rep spoke on and on, but he said great things–and was eventually shouted off the podium for time.

John McCreery has given us a reminder that the important thing is not just electing a president, but that getting twelve representatives, two senators, and one president–and even then, it is just the beginning.

The official count is in–156 people are here today, more than tripling past turnouts, and everyone is energized.

The straw poll is now being counted, and the figures coming in soon.

There was also discussion of how Americans abroad can vote–and according to Mr. McCreery, we should be able to vote for President, Vice President, and for members of Congress. The laws and regulations are laid out at www.fvap.gov.

Brent has the figures, I think, and is ready to announce the count: instant gratification–from the least: Al Sharpton got 1 vote; Wesley Clark with 11 votes; Uncommitted with 12 votes; Edwards with 15; Mr. Kucinich with 18; Kerry got 43; and Howard Dean came out with 52. Only groups with at least 15% of the straw poll can get candidates–you need 23%. However, another relevant rule is that we only get to elect three delegates to Scotland, so that three groups only can elect delegates. In the case of more than three viable groups, the three largest groups get the delegates. So there will be some horse trading as groups get together and talk about how votes get assigned and swapped and bartered and so forth.

More as it comes in. And I’ll clean this up later.

Categories: Tokyo Caucus Tags:

Caucus #2: The LCJ Delegation

February 8th, 2004 Comments off

Here’s a photo of Andrew, Barbara and I sitting front and center at the caucus–the Democratic Party Delegation from Lakeland Japan; the newly elected leader of the caucus, John McCreery of DAJ, is giving the opening explanation, with people asking questions throughout–not to mention the camera crew from Channel 4.

The straw poll is about to begin….

Categories: Tokyo Caucus Tags:

Caucus #1: Live from the Caucus!

February 8th, 2004 Comments off

Well, we’ve just gotten our final 5-minute warning (as opposed to all the other 5-minute warnings), but this time it looks for real, and the caucus will get started. I was very happy to find a live WiFi connection here, so I’ll be blogging from here as often as I can.

The turnout is amazing. Usually about 40 or 50 people turn out to the caucus–but now there are about 150 people crowding the room! And Barbara came in at the last minute–the office gang, and Sako from the Expat, are all here!

Now for the fun to begin!

Categories: Tokyo Caucus Tags: