The Palin Theories
So, why did Palin resign? There are several different theories:
1. She was telling the truth. Just from her record alone, we can pretty easily dismiss this one outright. Palin is, for the most part, congenitally incapable of telling the truth where her record and policies are concerned.
But truthfully: the media hounding her and political enemies calling for investigations? Please. Even if we accept Palin’s worldview and ignore the fact that she has personally invited every single jab in the media and every single investigation into her wrongdoings, either by making a huge deal of herself or by literally welcoming scrutiny, then what this says about her is that she can’t take the heat. If she is so weak a politician that she can’t stand up to the media, how can we believe that she’ll be capable of standing up to a serious opponent? How would she deal with North Korea? Resign from office because they’re being so mean?
2. She wants freedom to run for president in 2012. If this is true, then Palin is even more of a schizophrenic moron than I thought she was. Nothing says “presidential material” more than quitting in mid-term because you just can’t take all that negativity from the media and the ethics investigators.
She may just as well tattooed the word “QUITTER” on her forehead, because that’s what every opponent–especially her fellow Republicans–will label her as if she tries to run against anybody from now on.
But she might actually believe that this is the right move: that by doing this, she will be a victim (which played very well for her in the Letterman affair), a martyr who sacrificed herself for the people, the party, and her cause. She may actually believe that her speech defused the whole “quitter” stigma just because she tried to call “quitting” “winning.”
If this scenario is true, then she’s in for a bit of a disappointment.
3. Something Big is coming. There is a huge scandal that we haven’t heard about yet, and Palin resigned so as to avoid the worst of its consequences.
This seems to be the best theory because nothing else makes sense; the other two theories are so lacking in credibility that it is commonly assumed that this must be the real reason. We just haven’t seen the other shoe drop yet.
This makes sense on many fronts. First of all, Palin not only lies, steals, and breaks the law, but she has done it so transparently that it defies belief. As we just found out in Vanity Fair:
After one meeting between the governor and legislators in 2007, Lyda Green, then the president of the state senate, returned to her office to catch up on some paperwork. She caught Palin on the news. “And she comes on TV and says, ‘I want to once again confirm that neither I nor my staff ever holds closed-door meetings.’ Well, we had just been in a closed-door meeting for an hour and a half!”
That Palin does this suggests that she may simply have no “ethical filter,” that she simply cannot tell right from wrong, or truth from lie–or else is so blindingly arrogant that she just believes she can get away with anything without even trying to hide it. Either way, it makes it much easier to find her guilty of something. And that may be what happened: that she did something so illegal or unethical that it’s coming to bite her in the ass.
Second, the way she resigned seems tailor-made for pre-emption. She set the stage by making multiple claims that her political enemies were out to get her with false accusations, wasting all that taxpayer money. She’s a victim, she’s trying to tell us–so that when charges come out, she can say, “See! Just what I was talking about, what a coincidence!” and pretend like it’s just another false charge that her enemies have trumped up.
Third, if she quits before charges are made, she removes the scrutiny of being an office-holder. If a huge scandal erupts while you’re governor, then being in office is a liability. If you’re an ex-governor, then it’s old news. She can claim that all of that is behind her, hope that people forget it, and then run for office after it’s all gone away. And let’s face it, you can get away with murder while in office–all you have to do is resign and suddenly investigations collapse. [Edit: in retrospect, this claim is a bit much–criminal investigations can certainly follow you out of office. But it is also true that prosecutors will often stop following a case after the office-holder has left office, that being commonly considered ‘punishment enough.’ A sitting governor who took a bribe is far more of a threat to society than an ex-governor who can no longer cause any harm.]
Sure, quitting and then having a damaging scandal revealed aren’t exactly career-builders, but it may be that she simply has no choice–that staying on as governor would be far worse. If there’s a big scandal coming, then this could be Palin’s best chance to salvage her career.
Of course, there are two more theories:
4. Palin is a total wimp. This is an alternate reading of theory #1, above. Maybe she just can’t take it any more. In which case she doesn’t belong in politics. Or:
5. Palin is batshit insane. This could simply be the act of a completely stupid and crazy person doing things for reasons that only make sense to her. We certainly cannot rule out that possibility. Crazy people don’t need good reasons.
Any other theories?
Late thought: I forgot to mention something that had been rolling through my mind: the timing. Palin announced this on “Take Out the Trash Day,” Friday before a holiday weekend. If this was a push where she really wanted to ride the wave of publicity, she would not have made the statement on a day perfect for burying news stories, a day famous for killing the momentum of news stories.
Another reason not to buy into the idea that she is “gearing up” and “reloading both chambers” for a new political offensive–unless, of course we return to the “crazy” or “stupid” scenarios, in which Palin is showing extremely bad judgment.
Later Update: The Brad Blog is following the stories that the “iceberg scandal” is the reason why Palin resigned, and that it has to do with upcoming federal indictments for embezzlement. Short version: Palin is in trouble for her relationship with the building contractor, Spenard Building Supplies, which has been under investigation by federal authorities. The Wasilla Sports Center and the Palins’ home are both part of the focus. These reports have been circulating for a while, but nothing solid has come out about it yet. Keep in mind, this could just be baseless speculation–people searching for a ‘scandal,’ latching on to an investigation that may or may not be going anywhere, that may or may not even involve Palin herself.
If it is what pushed Palin out, then I have another prediction: seconds after the official announcement is made, the Right Wing will explode in conspiracy theories about how Obama directed the FBI to sabotage the career of his most likely rival in 2012.
I could be wrong; any takers on that bet?
For the time being, the right-wing blogs are speculating on much friendlier theories, like ‘she wants to spend more time with her family,’ or ‘there is a grave illness, and won’t those nasty liberals feel like crap when it comes out.’ Other are still on the ‘brilliant political play’ theory that she’s getting ready for 2012.
Theory number 3 is the most likely.
The “David Lettermen” side of me thinks that she found out just how much money was in the Porn industry and decided to strike while she could. Of course if she lends up at Fox News, that too is a form of pronography, political pornography.
From my years managing projects, I developed the ‘sled dog’ theory of human management. It goes like this: sled dogs (huskeys, malemutes) love to pull sleds. If they are not stopped by their owners, they will literaly pull the sled until their heart gives out. Beagles are expert (and quite smart) at hunting rabbits. Around the house beagles lumber around and make great lap dogs. Show them a rabbit and they suddenly become their evil twin – to the rabbit. If you want to pull a sled you don’t hire a beagle, and if you want to chase rabbits you don’t hire a huskey. Furthermore, a huskey that’s never seen snow is still highly competant at pulling sleds, as is a beagle that’s never seen rabbits is highly competant at hunting them. Also, A beagle would quit his job as the King of England, if it meant he could hunt rabbits full time without giving it a second thought.
I found, managing projects, that if you give people enough options and chances they’ll gravitate towards what they are good at, and soon you’ll have the beagles chasing rabbits and the huskies pulling sleds. If you arrive at this, people will think you are a managing genious – because you people working like dogs that won’t quit an who are highly effective at their tasks and everybody is happy.
At the very least, Palin, is gravitating towards what she is ‘bred’ to do.
At the very least, I think she might have quit simply because she decided she wanted to be a full time gadfly for the wingnut wing of the wingnut party. What I imagine is that there are wingnut events all over the country that want her and are willing to pay, but she can’t cover them all because she has this dead end job up in Juneau, Alaska. Remember the beagle – why be governor of Alaska when you can chase rabbits in Tennessee.
That means she’ll be a sort of Ann Coulter or Michelle Whatshername or more appropriate, Joe Scarborough. And she’ll be the ultimate gadfly. Her accomplishments? Mayor of a town of 8,000 and Governor for 30 months of a state that only has about 300,000 people in it.
There’s one more theory to consider, less exciting than the others: she can’t afford it anymore. Her tremendous legal expenses, plus the costs of raising her children and grandchild means she can’t make it on a governor’s salary anymore. (And don’t tell me most of her family expenses are taken care of through her official position. How much do you want to bet she has three maxed out credit cards?) And in order to successfully fund-raise, she needs spend her time in the lower 48.
I am, however, confused as to how stepping down would mean avoiding a major scandal. Whether she’s a public figure or a citizen, whatever “there is there” will still come out, right?
Steve: I don’t buy it, and for two very solid reasons.
Reason #1: She’d have said so. The appeal of playing the victim again would have been too strong for her to resist. She had no problems whatsoever using her young daughter as fodder for her faked outrage at Letterman, knowing full well that he meant Bristol and not Willow, and that everyone else knew it too–but she was all too willing to drag her younger daughter into the fray when she could have been sufficiently outraged just defending Bristol. So you can’t tell me that she was too ashamed or shy or private to use her own finances as an excuse.
The fact is, had she been run to the poor house by all of this, she would have come right out and said so. It would play perfectly not only into her being the victim, but also would defuse all the ideas about her taking money. As I mentioned in the post, she has repeatedly been found with her hand in the till, claiming per diems she wasn’t entitled to, claiming travel expenses she was not entitled to, going on spending sprees, etc.–claiming she had to quit because her family was going broke under the strain of all the legal expenses would have been perfect for her. She would definitely have been up front about it, playing it to the hilt. The fact she did not makes it pretty clear that it was not a factor.
Reason #2: She’s not broke. Do you really think that she’s limited to a “governor’s salary”? The woman signed a book deal with HarperCollins last November, rumored to be worth up to $7 million dollars. No way her legal expenses will even come close to that. Not to mention that being as hugely popular on the right as she is, you can be certain that she has a very well-funded support base that will help with her legal costs in the long run.
So, she left office because she’s going broke? Nice try, but it doesn’t even come close to holding water.
Now, what I will buy is that she quit earlier so she could make more money sooner–out of office, she can start demanding exorbitant fees on the lecture circuit, raking it in while pushing herself as a candidate. I didn’t consider that when I wrote the above post, but now that you mention personal finances, it not only pops out but it also makes lots of sense. Being out of office means she can cash in much earlier and much more successfully, without worrying about going stale. After today, the value of her memoirs probably just shot up–iceberg scandal or not.
So the appeal of raking in millions, perhaps. But the threat of going broke? Not a chance.
Well, I wasn’t “trying” anything other than engaging in innocent speculation. Sorry. I didn’t remember the book deal.
Steve: no need to get defensive, the two words “nice try” don’t make for the whole response to be an attack or something. You forwarded an idea, I responded. Your own parenthetical “don’t tell me” comment was of the same level as the “nice try” comment; I was not escalating or anything.
By the way, there is a legal defense fund Palin is using to defray her legal costs, so we can be pretty sure she’s not emptying the bank account in that regard. Plus, her husband is making money himself. The Palin’s combined income is around $250,000, their house is worth half a million, and they have a healthy retirement fund–so I think that even without the book deal, they were still very healthy financially. As expensive as it is to live in Alaska, I don’t think there’s a chance in heck that they have three maxed-out credit cards from family expenses–unless they have been spending very irresponsibly.
I just remembered many states have ethics laws that forbid elected officials from cashing in on a book until after they leave office. I don’t know if it applies to Alaska, but if it does, can we say “bingo”?
She probably could pay them off over a reasonable period of time anyway, but that would go against her impuslive nature.
HuffPost had a blurb about Levi Johnston (the teenage father of the new Palin grandson) saying that Palin was getting tons of lucrative offers and that she’s probably quitting to cash in on some of them.
That resignation speech was a doozy, no?