Fuji, Day and Dusk
January 21st, 2005
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jan | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
All original content on this site is owned by and copyrighted by the author. If you wish to reproduce beyond Fair Use provisions, you must leave a comment and ask for permission.
2013
2011
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004



It’s creepy just how much Mt Fuji looks like Mt St Helens USED to look. Before it blew off over a thousand feet of its top.
Good pictures, though. Have you blown many up into prints, and if so, how’s the quality? I’m needing a new digicam and the lower # of megapixels scares me about your camera model…
Paul
Enumclaw
Yeah, Fuji is not a dormant volcano–it last erupted about 300 years ago, I think… the local governments have plans for acting should it go. Hopefully that won’t happen in July or August, when there are many thousands of people all up and down the two or three pathways to the peak. That would not be good.
As for prints, I never make prints any more, so I can’t tell you how they come out. Sorry. But they do say that if you want to make 8×10 prints, that they would not be like 35mm blowups with only 3.2 megapixels; I think they recommend a minimum of 4 or something. So I suppose that if you’re going to make big prints, this model won’t be so much for you. Otherwise, it is a great camera.