Home > Political Ranting > Not Good At What They’re “Good At”

Not Good At What They’re “Good At”

December 31st, 2006

“Devilstower” at DKos hits the nail on the head with this writing about the Republican Party. In a nutshell: Republicans are supposed to be for smaller government, but have increased its size and power over the people; they are supposed to be for fiscal responsibility, but have exploded the deficit and debt; they are supposed to be good at managing the military, but have decimated it in a series of massive strategic blunders while crapping on the soldiery; and they’re supposed to be tough on crime, but after Democrat Clinton oversaw a steep decline in the crime rate, it has started to rise under Bush.

Democrats might not be stellar at managing the military or keeping government small, but they are far better at it than Republicans; and while the Republicans suck at deficits and law & order, Democrats do a very good job. Democrats also are historically much better at creating new jobs as well, while Republicans have overseen an economy where well-paying American jobs have been shipped overseas, middle-class Americans have lower salaries and fewer benefits, and the tax burden is steadily shifted more and more onto the backs of the middle class.

Then there are also freedoms. Republicans are very big on freedoms, on protecting the Constitution, and making sure that government doesn’t infringe on our individual right to be left alone and not interfered with. But this administration has suspended habeas corpus, instituted warrantless wiretaps against U.S. citizens and claimed the right to do so universally without oversight, and can even arrest you and detain you without a warrant or any charges at all. You can be held indefinitely without charges or access to an attorney, and can even be declared an enemy combatant and stripped of your citizenship, on the basis of evidence that can be kept top secret and never reviewed by anyone. Are Republicans really OK with this, based solely upon the promise that the government will only use this against terrorists, cross their hearts?

And then there’s responsibility, honesty, and accountability, right? Republicans respect these virtues especially, don’t they? Except that the Republican Party has been horribly irresponsible, drowned in scandals and mismanagement whilst simultaneously shutting down ethics investigations while they were in power. Republicans have been steeped in financial criminality and cronyism, and when they are caught red-handed, they always blame somebody else and everybody else–and only when all of that fails, do they “bravely” step up and “take responsibility” even while they persist in claiming they did nothing wrong and it was still somebody else’s fault.

Republicans are also big on the bottom line, as I recall. On getting good results. Say no more. (Unless, of course, you have an extraordinary respect for underhanded political maneuvering.)

Again, Democrats may not be all that hot themselves, but in all of these areas conservatives claim to respect and value, they at the very least do a better job than Republicans, and in many areas do a far better job than the GOP.

So, exactly what conservative values are actually being upheld by Republicans? Doesn’t leave much, does it? Except for the question, if all of those things are important to you and you are voting Republican, then why are you voting Republican? Inertia?

Categories: Political Ranting Tags: by
  1. Tim Kane
    December 31st, 2006 at 11:28 | #1

    As I recall, when the Republican’s took over, the claim was that the grown ups are back in charge. It will be fifty years, if ever, that they can ever plausibly make that claim again. Its a bit bizarre, that at their zenith of power, arrived at after decades of painstaking planning, and massive spending to build institutions and think tanks, to create a political party that markets its product like a corporation, that they picked a box of rocks twit like George Bush to run things. He, the man who would finally bury every remaining legacy of Roosevelt has only managed to push his pedastal into the stratosphere.

    American society is based upon only one principle: Free contract. Freedom is simply a necessary component for there to be free contract. All the rhetoric about freedom in America is simply one of the means to arrive at free contract.

    In a society based only on the principle of free contract, only one thing counts: bargaining power.

    In American, almost everything that goes on is about that: from commercials on TV, to politics in Washington to personal grooming, its all about people trying to accrue an added margin of bargaining power.

    What the Republican party is really all about is helping the wealthy and powerful to gain ever greater concentrations of wealth and power within the context of free contrac. That’s what its always been about.

    Everything else coming out of the Republican party is just carbon fibre use to obtain what they are really after.

    But what about the principle of fairness?

    One problem with all that. For contracts to be upheld, they require a legal system to uphold them. And legal systems must be based upon fairness first, freedom second.

    You can’t have contracts without law and you can’t have law without fairness, and that means you can’t have contracts without fairness. And massive concentration of wealth and power is inherently unfair.

    Because of this massive contridiction in fundemental principles, the Republican dream state, ultimately, cannot succeed, but can only collapse upon itself. On so many levels, Bush and the Bush administration is the manifestation of all of that.

  2. Luis
    December 31st, 2006 at 11:34 | #2

    Tim: Very well put. I always feel bad that I don’t respond to your comments much. Please understand that it is simply due to the fact that you put things so well, it is hard to find anything else to say.

Comments are closed.