Home > iPad > iPad vs. Kindle

iPad vs. Kindle

January 29th, 2010

Unless you have some very specific needs, I can’t really see how the Kindle could outclass the iPad as an e-book reader, especially if you compare like sizes–the iPad vs. the 9.7“ Kindle.

Now, that’s all subjective, and depends on what you prefer and what you can stand. Some people will prefer the Kindle no matter what because the e-ink screen is less a strain on their eyes. Others will very much prefer a backlit display (my father sent his Kindle back because he couldn’t read in bed with the lights off).

I decided to make an impromptu chart to compare the two. Advantages are colored in orange. Note that I did not give either machine an advantage for the screen type (depending on visual preferences), WiFi vs. 3G (Amazon’s 3G connectivity is free), keyboard type (some people will always prefer a physical keyboard), or even the USB / VGA comparison (despite the video out, the iPad requires adaptors which many dislike).

The Kindle DX has an advantage with slightly higher resolution and pixels per inch (ppi) screen density, a slightly lighter body, and far superior battery life. If e-ink and long battery life are critical for you, then the Kindle wins hands-down–with all cylinders firing, it gets more than 4 days of continuous use; with the 3G used only sporadically and when used even at heavy reading rates, the Kindle can last weeks on a single charge. Some also claim that weight is an issue when you’re holding that device up for hours on end, and a 5-ounce difference is a difference some will balk at.

The iPad, meanwhile, is not limited to being an ebook reader, but if only used for that, it could still hold its own. For the same price as the Kindle DX, you get full color, a backlit screen, and four times the storage in a smaller form factor. But in addition, you get… well… a computer. You get to run apps, read email, play games, and most anything else a computer can do. You can run an office suite, watch movies and TV shows, all that and more–virtually no limits within the allowances of the hardware.

iPad vs. Kindle
  iPad Kindle
Overall Size 9.56" x 7.47" x 0.5" 10.4" x 7.2" x 0.38"
Screen size (diag) 9.7" 9.7"
Screen Type backlit LCD ISP touch e-ink, no backlight
Colors millions (?) 16 grays
Resolution 1024 x 768 (132 ppi) 1200 x 824 (150 ppi)
Weight 24 oz. 18.9 oz.
CPU 1 GHz custom 532 MHz Freescale
Storage 16 GB 4 GB
Battery life 10 hours "1 week" (4 days)
Wireless Wi-Fi (n), Bluetooth 3G (free)
Main connectors iPod USB
USB / VGA yes / yes (adaptor) yes / no
Book Store yes (? vols.) yes (400,000 vols.)
App Store yes no
Browser Safari "rudimentary"
Email Mail no
Games yes no
Plays music yes yes
Plays Movies/TV yes no
Keyboard touchscreen physical
Price $499 $489

So the question becomes, what are you looking for? Just an ebook reader geared toward general ebook reading preferences? Or an all-in-one device with loads of potential? Comparing the two is a bit jarring because they are different beasts, but like comparing the iPhone and the Zune, they both cover the same territory, and then one goes a lot further, for about the same price. And we all know how stunning a success the Zune has been.

Categories: iPad Tags: by
  1. Leszek Cyfer
    January 29th, 2010 at 17:03 | #1

    I’d place the access to Amazon eBooks for Kindle as a huge asset – I don’t imagine they’ll let iPad to download their eBooks. I know that Apple is cooperating with large booksellers, but I don’t think anything is comparable to Amazon’s base of eBooks.

    Anyway’s I think a new player on the market for eBooks will be good for readers – the eBooks are bound to get cheaper ultimately :)

  2. Roger
    January 30th, 2010 at 03:16 | #2

    Leszek, enter the Kindle for iPhone app – a free app that gives the iPhone (and one would presume, the iPad as well) full access to the Amazon store: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2342461,00.asp This would tip the Book Store advantage clearly into iPad’s favor… as iPad would have access to every title that Kindle does – plus many more from the Apple store and presumably elsewhere. I agree with PC Mag writer Sascha Seagan who believes that Apple and Amazon could be “the best of enemies” due to their complimentary business models… with Apple focused on the device – and Amazon focused on content. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2346545,00.asp

    To me, e-ink is the biggest advantage that Kindle has… even though, obviously, Apple’s LCD screen has distinct advantages of its own. Now… what if someone were to come out with color e-ink? hmm…

  3. Leszek Cyfer
    January 31st, 2010 at 06:14 | #3

    Yeah, Amazon still gets the money for books so it would be stupid for them to cut their gains. I havent thought of it this way :/

    So the best way for Amazon is to advance the e-paper technology and make the Kindle better (there’s still a lot to do)

Comments are closed.